Uso del conteo simultáneo supraforestal y del muestreo de distancias para estimar poblaciones de sarrio

J. Herrero; A. García Serrano; C. Prada; O. Fernández Arberas

doi:10.3989/pirineos.2011.166006

Authors

J. Herrero Area of Ecology. Technical School of Huesca. University of Zaragoza
A. García Serrano Ega Wildlife Consultants
C. Prada Ega Wildlife Consultants
O. Fernández Arberas Ega Wildlife Consultants

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2011.166006

Keywords:

Rupicapra p. pyrenaica, block count, distance sampling, above the timberline, mountain environments, mountain ungulates, Pyrenees

Abstract

This study compared the efficacies of total block counts (BC) and distance sampling (DS) procedures to estimate the abundance of chamois populations in two mountain massifs, Posets and Maladeta, Spain. In 2002, 2006, 2007, and 2008, chamois populations were surveyed along itineraries above the timberline, twice per year: in July, after the parturition period, and in November, during the rut. The latter survey was used to estimate the sex ratio and to correct the proportion of males present in July. In 2008, poor weather prevented surveys in November. In the DS procedure, we used the data collected using BC and calculated the distances of the mapped groups to the itinerary, using a Geographical Information System. In Posets, estimates of population densities derived using BC ranged from 5.5 to 9.1 chamois km^-2, while those derived using DS ranged from 7.5 to 9.7 chamois km^-2. In Maladeta, the estimates ranged from 3.4 to 5.4 chamois km^-2 (BC) and from 4.6 to 8.5 chamois km^-2 (DS). Coefficients of variation of DS ranged between 14% and 26%. In five of eight cases the counts of population size derived from BC were within the 95% confidence interval of the estimate derived from DS. In two of the other three cases, weather conditions created poor visibility during the rut, and few chamois were seen and, consequently, the rut sex ratio could not be estimated. BC provided objective, high-quality counts of chamois populations and it is easy to obtain, even if its efficacy can be constrained by the need of simultaneous itineraries and an underestimation of unknown magnitude. DS does not require sampling throughout the entire area above the timberline, and generates an estimate and a confidence interval; however, calculations require some skill and sample size must be high (n > 300 groups observed to produce a CV < 15%), which represents a sampling effort at least as large as the one derived from BC. BC represents a valuable tool and, it should continue to be used to estimate minimum population size and the derived hunting quotas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afonso, A., Alpizar-Jara, M., Moço, G., Granados, J.E., & Pérez, J.M., 2008. Dimensión de la muestra y estimación de la variancia en muestreo por distancias: una aplicación en la estima de abundancia de poblaciones de ungulados de montaña. In: J.E. Granados, J. Cano-Manuel León, P. Fandos París, R. Cadenas de Llano Aguilar (Eds.). Tendencias actuales en el Estudio y Conservación de los Caprinos Europeos. Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Medio Ambiente. Pp. 15-30.

Aulagnier, S., Giannatos, G. & Herrero, J., 2008. Rupicapra rupicapra. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. . Downloaded on 19 November 2010.

Berducou, C., Besson, C., & Guardas monitores del PNP, 1982. Dynamique des populations d´isards du Parc National des Pyrénées. Acta Biologica Montana 1: 153-175.

Borchers, D. L., Buckland, S.T. & Zucchini, W., 2002. Estimating animal abundance. Closed populations. Springer-Verlag, London, U.K.

Buckland, S.T., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. & Thomas, L., 2001. Introduction to distance sampling. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.

Cano, M., García-Rovés, P., González-Quirós, P. & Nores, C., 2009. Experiencias de estimación de poblaciones de rebeco en la Cordillera Cantábrica. En: F.J. Pérez-Barbería y B. Palacios (Eds.). El rebeco cantábrico Rupicapra pyrenaica parva. Conservación y Gestión de sus poblaciones. Naturaleza y Parques Nacionales. Serie Técnica. Escós, J. & Alados, C.L., 1988. Estimating mountain ungulate density in Sierras de Cazorla y Segura. Mammalia, 52(3): 425-428.

Franzetti, B. & Focardi, S., 2006. La stima di popolazione degli ungulati mediante Distance sampling e termocamera a infrarossi. Min. Politiche Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali â Ist. Naz. Fauna Selvatica, Documenti Tecnici, 26: 1-88.

Garcáa-González, R., Hidalgo, R., Herrero, J. & Ameztoy, J.M., 1992. Census, population structure and habitat use of a chamois population living in sympatry with Pyrenean wild goat. In: Ongulés/Ungulates. 91. Pp. 321-325.

F. Spitz, G. Janeau, G. Gonzalez and S. Aulaguier (Eds). SFEPM-IRGM. Paris, Toulouse.

Garin, I. & Herrero, J., 1997. Distribution, abundance and demographic parameters of the Pyrenean chamois (Rupicapra p. pyrenaica) in Navarre, Western Pyrenees. Mammalia, 61(1): 55-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/mamm.1997.61.1.55

Herrero, J., Escudero, E., García, J.M., García-Serrano, A., Prada, C. & Couto, S., 2004. Gestión y seguimiento demográfico del sarrio en el Pirineo aragonés. In: J. Herrero., E. Escudero, D. Fernández de Luco, R. García- González (Eds.). El sarrio: biología, patología y gestión. Consejo de Protección de la Naturaleza de Aragón, Gobierno de Aragón, Zaragoza. Pp. 69-82.

Herrero, J., Lovari, S. & Berducou, C., 2008. Rupicapra pyrenaica. In: IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2010.4. . Downloaded on 19 November 2010.

Houssin, H., Loison, A., Jullien, J.M. & Gaillard, J.M. 1994. Validité de la méthode du pointage-flash pour l´estimation des effectifs de chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). Gibier Faune Sauvage, 11 (4): 287-298.

Moço, G., Guerreiro, M., Ferreira, A.F., Rebelo, A., Loureiro, A., Petrucci- Fonseca, F. & Pérez, J.M., 2006. The ibex Capra pyrenica returns to its former Portuguese range. Oryx, 40 (3): 351-354.

Monteiro, J.F., Alpizar-Jara, R., Serrano, E., Crampe, J.P. & Pérez, J.M., 2008. Estimación Bayesiana de go usando el muestreo por distancias y su aplicación en las estimas de densidad de ungulados de montaña. In: J. Granados, J. Cano-Manuel León, P. Fandos París, R. Cadenas de Llano Aguilar (Eds.). Tendencias actuales en el Estudio y Conservación de los Caprinos Europeos. Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Medio Ambiente. Pp 207-218.

Pañella, P., Herrero, J., Canut, J. & García-Serrano, A., 2011. Long-term monitoring of Pyrenean chamois in a protected area reveals a fluctuating population. Hystrix (in press).

Pérez, J.M., Granados, J.E., Soriguer, R.C., Fandos, P., Márquez, F.J. & Crampe, J.-P., 2002. Distribution, status and conservation problems of the Spanish Ibex, Capra pyrenaica (Mammalia: Artiodactyla) Mammal Review, 32(1): 26-39.

Thomas, L., Buckland, S.T., Burnham, K.P., Anderson, D.R., Laake, J.L., Borchers, D.L. & Strindberg, S., 2002. Distance sampling. In: El-Shaarawi A.H, and W.W. Piegorsch (Eds). Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Volume 1, pp 544-552. PMid:20383262 PMCid:2847204

Thomas, L., Laake, J.L., Strindberg, S., Marques, F.C., Buckland, S.T., Borchers, D.L., Anderson, D.R., Burnham, K.P., Hedley, S.L., Pollard, J.H., Bishop, J.R.B. & Marques, T.A., 2006. Distance 5.0. Release 2. Research Unit for Wildlife Population Assessment, University of St. Andrews, UK. http://www.ruwpa.st-and.ac.uk/distance/.

Thomas, L., Buckland, S., Rexstad, E.A., Laake, J.L., Strindberg, S., Hedley, S.L., Bishop, J.R.B., Marques, T.A. & Burnham, F.P., 2010. Distance Software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. Journal of Applied Ecology, 47: 5-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01737.x