Mountain seeds: gathering, uses and commercialization of seeds of the monkey puzzle tree (Araucaria araucana) by Mapuche-Pewenche communities of the southern Andes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3989/pirineos.2019.174008Keywords:
Indigenous peoples, forest, non-timber forest products, commodification, ChileAbstract
The monkey puzzle tree (Araucaria araucana), or pewen in Mapuche language, is a native tree from Chile and Argentina with a strong cultural importance for Mapuche-Pewenche communities from the southern Andes. Using qualitative methodologies and ethnografic techniques, we assessed the different current uses, and economic and commercial aspects associated with the seed of the monkey puzzle tree in a mountainous municipality of south-central Chile. Local practices related to the seed show the intrinsic and material importance of this seed for both Pewenche and other settlers. Our results show that these practices include from the gathering, through the bulk selling, to the commercialization of processed products from the seed and an increasing offer of touristic experiences integrating seeds, trees, culture and local landscapes. We conclude that gathering, uses and commercialization processes associated with the araucaria seed have two main components that establish a continuous dialogue: one economic component, in the commercial and livelihood vein, and a biocultural component, in the spiritual, social, ecological and food sense.
Downloads
References
Aagesen, D.L., 1998. Indigenous resource rights and conservation of the monkey-puzzle tree (Araucaria araucana, araucariaceae): A case study from Southern Chile. Economic Botany, 52: 146. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861203
Aguilera-Betti, I., Muñoz, A.A., Stahle, D., Figueroa, G., Duarte, F., González-Reyes, Á., Christie, D., Lara, A., González, M.E., Sheppard, P.R., Sauchyn, D., Moreira-Muñoz, A., Toledo- Guerrero, I., Olea, M., Apaz, P. & Fernández, P., 2017. The First Millennium-Age Araucaria Araucana in Patagonia. Tree-Ring Research, 73 (1): 53-56. https://doi.org/10.3959/1536-1098-73.1.53
Aguilera, I., 2016. De la Cocina al Estado Nación: El Ingrediente Mapuche. Icaria, 320 pp., Santiago.
Barreau, A., 2014. Narrating changing foodways: wild edible plant knowledge and traditional food systems in Mapuche lands of the Andean Temperate Forests, Chile. University of British Columbia, 162 pp., Vancouver.
Barreau, A., Ibarra, J.T., Wyndham, F.S., Rojas, A., & Kozak, R.A., 2016. How can we teach our children if we cannot access the forest? Generational change in Mapuche knowledge of wild edible plants in Andean temperate ecosystems of Chile. Journal of Ethnobiology, 36 (2): 412-432. https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-36.2.412
Bengoa, J., 2000. Historia del pueblo mapuche siglos XIX y XX. LOM Ediciones, 430 pp., Santiago.
Bengoa, J., & Valenzuela, E., 1983. Economía mapuche: pobreza y subsistencia en la sociedad mapuche contemporánea. PAS, 121 pp., Santiago.
Bernard, H.R., 2005. Research methods in anthropology: qualitative and quantitative approaches. Altamira Press, 803 pp., Oxford.
Besoain, X.A., Guajardo, J., Larach, A., Riquelme, N., Galvez, E., Tapia, L., Alvarado, L.A., Saratscheff, T., & Celis-Diez, J.L., 2019. First Report of Diplodia seriata causing gummy canker in Araucaria araucana wild populations in southcentral Chile. Plant Disease, PDIS-01-19-0200-PDN. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-01-19-0200-PDN
CASEN, 2017. Encuesta de Caracterización Socioeconómica Nacional (Casen). Ministerio de Desarrollo Social de Chile, Santiago.
Cockle, K., Ibarra, J.T., Altamirano, T.A., & Martin, M., 2019. Interspecific networks of cavity-nesting vertebrates reveal a critical role of broadleaf trees in endangered Araucaria mixed forests of South America. Biodiversity and Conservation, In Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-019-01826-4
Comaroff, J.L., & Comaroff, J., 2011. Etnicidad S.A. Katz, 251 pp., Barcelona.
Coña, P., 2010. Lonco Pascual Coña ñi tuculpazugun: testimonio de un cacique mapuche. Pehuén, 491 pp., Santiago.
Descola, P., 2013. The ecology of others. Paradigm. Prickly Paradigm Press, 91 pp., Chicago.
Descola, P., & Gí sli, P., 1996. Nature and society: anthropological perspectives. Routledge, 310 pp., London.
Domeyko, I., 2010. La Araucanía y sus habitantes. Cámara Chilena de la Construcción, 237 pp., Santiago. https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-8883.2011.12259
Donoso, C., 2006. Las especies arbóreas de los bosques templados de Chile y Argentina: autoecología. Marisa Cuneo Ediciones, 678 pp., Valdivia.
Donoso, S., Peña-Rojas, K., Espinoza, C., Galdámes, E., & Pacheco, C., 2014. Producción, permanencia y germinación de semillas de Araucaria araucana (Mol.) K. Koch en bosques
naturales, aprovechados por comunidades indígenas del sur de Chile. Interciencia, 39 (5): 338-343.
Escobar, A., 1999. After Nature: Steps to an antiessentialist political ecology. Current Anthropology, 40 (1): 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1086/515799
FIA, 2010. Resultados y lecciones en producción, técnicas de poscosecha y desarrollo de productos a partir del piñón. Fundación para la Innovación Agraria (FIA), 50 pp., Santiago.
Fraser, N., 1998. Iustitia Interrupta Reflexiones críticas desde la posición "postsocialista." Revista de Estudios Sociales, (2): 150-151. https://doi.org/10.7440/res2.1998.29
Friedmann, H., 1980. Household Production and the National Economy: Concepts for the Analysis of Agrarian Formations. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 7 (2): 158-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066158008438099
Gajardo, R., 1993. La vegetación natural de Chile: clasificación y distribución geográfica. Editorial Universitaria, 165 pp., Santiago.
Garibaldi, A., & Turner, N., 2004. Cultural Keystone Species: Implications for Ecological Conservation and Restoration. Ecology and Society, 9 (3): 1. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-00669-090301
Gedda, M., 2010. Araucanía de Chile. Patrimonio natural y cultural de sus territorios. Editorial Pehuén, 320 pp., Santiago.
González, M.E., Veblen, T.T., & Sibold, J.S., 2005. Fire history of Araucaria-Nothofagus forests in Villarrica National Park, Chile. Journal of Biogeography, (32): 1187-202. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2005.01262.x
Herrmann, T.M., 2005. Knowledge, values, uses and management of the Araucaria araucana forest by the indigenous Mapuche Pewenche people: A basis for collaborative natural resource management in southern Chile. Natural Resources Forum, 29 (2): 120-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2005.00121.x
Herrmann, T.M., 2006. Indigenous Knowledge and Management of Araucaria Araucana Forest in the Chilean Andes: Implications for Native Forest Conservation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 15 (2): 647-662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-005-2092-6
Ibarra, J.T., Altamirano, T.A., Gálvez, N., Rojas, I., Laker, J., & Bonacic, C., 2010. Avifauna de los bosques templados de Araucaria araucana del sur de Chile. Ecología Austral, 20: 33-45.
Ibarra, J.T., Barreau, A., Massardo, F., & Rozzi, R., 2012. El cóndor andino: una especie biocultural clave del paisaje sudamericano. Boletín Chileno de Ornitología, 18 (1-2): 1-22.
INE, 2017. Censo poblacional nacional de Chile. Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas, Santiago.
Ingold, T., 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge, 480 pp., Londres.
Isla, J., 2001. Pewenche. Estudios sobre territorio y proceso social. Universidad de Chile, 72 pp., Santiago.
Jacques-Coper, A., Cubillos, G. & Ibarra, J.T., 2019. The Andean Condor as bird, authority, and devil: an empirical assessment of the biocultural keystone species concept in the high Andes of Chile. Ecology and Society, 24 (2): 35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10939-240235
Kerssen, T.M., 2015. Food Sovereignty and the Quinoa Boom: Challenges to Sustainable Re-Peasantisation in the Southern Altiplano of Bolivia. Third World Quarterly, 36 (3): 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1002992
Kohn, E., 2013. How forests think: toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press, 280 pp., Berkeley. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520276109.001.0001
Maffi, L., 2001. On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, 578 pp., Washington DC.
Mintz, S.W., 1996. Dulzura y poder: el lugar del azúcar en la historia moderna. Siglo Veintiuno, 299 pp., México DF.
Molina, J., Martín, A., Drake, F., Martín, L., & Herrera, M., 2015. Fragmentation of Araucaria araucana forests in Chile: quantification and correlation with structural variables. iForest (8): e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1399-008
Neira, Z., 1995. La importancia de la semilla de Araucaria araucana para la unidad familiar pehuenche. Revista Desarrollo Agroforestal y Comunidad Campesina, 4 (20): 46-51.
Neri, J.P., 2017. Quinua, comunidad y relaciones capitalistas en el altiplano sur boliviano. Revista de Estudios Bolivianos, 27: 147-167.
Otero, L., 2006. La huella del fuego: historia de los bosques nativos. Poblamiento y cambios en el paisaje del sur de Chile. Editorial Pehuén, 171 pp., Santiago.
Pauchard, A., & Alaback, P.B., 2004. Influences of evaluation, land use and landscape context on patterns of alien plant invasions along roadsides in protected areas of south -central Chile. Conservation Biology, 18(1): 238-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00300.x
Perasso, P., 2012. Efectos de la entrega de tierras de CONADI en una comunidad Pehuenche de la comuna de Lonquimay. Universidad de Chile, 121 pp., Santiago.
Plan de Desarrollo Comunal Lonquimay, 2016. PLADECO Lonquimay 2018-2022. Ilustre Municipalidad de Lonquimay, 110 pp., Lonquimay.
Premoli, A., Quiroga, P., & Gardner, M., 2013. Araucaria araucana. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2013: e.T31355A2805113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK. 2013-1.RLTS.T31355A2805113.en
Reiche, C., 2013. Geografía botánica de Chile. Cámara Chilena de la Construcción, 556 pp., Santiago.
Reis, M.S. dos, Ladio, A., & Peroni, N., 2014. Landscapes with Araucaria in South America: evidence for a cultural dimension. Ecology and Society, 19 (2): 43. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06163-190243
Sandoval, C., 2002. Investigación cualitativa. ARFO Editores, Colombia.
Schejtman, A., 1980. Economía campesina: lógica interna, articulación y persistencia. Revisa CEPAL, 11: 121-140. https://doi.org/10.18356/d3b74c62-es
Skewes, J.C., & Guerra, D.E., 2016. Sobre árboles, volcanes y lagos: algunos giros ontológicos para comprender la geografía mapuche cordillerana del sur de Chile. Intersecciones en Antropología, 17 (1): 63-76.
Speziale, K.L., Lambertucci, S.A., Gleiser, G., Tella, J.L., Hiraldo, F., & Aizen, M.A., 2018. An overlooked plant-parakeet mutualism counteracts human overharvesting on an endangered tree. Royal Society Open Science, 5 (1): 171456. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171456 PMid:29410848 PMCid:PMC5792925
Tacón, A., & Palma, J., 2006. La comercialización de los productos forestales no madereros: una oportunidad para el manejo comunitario y la valorización del bosque nativo. En: Catalán, R., Wilken, P., Kandzior, A., Tecklin, D., & Burschel, H. (Eds.), Bosques y comunidades del sur de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, 253-266 pp., Santiago.
Wilhelm de Mösbach, E.W., 1992. Botánica indígena de Chile. Editorial Andrés Bello, 120 pp., Santiago.
Zamorano-Elgueta C., Cayuela, L., González-Espinosa, M., Lara, A., & Parra-Vázquez, M. R., 2012. Impacts of cattle on the South American temperate forests: Challenges for the conservation of the endangered monkey puzzle tree (Araucaria araucana) in Chile. Biological Conservation, 152: 110-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.03.037
Zúñiga, C., 2013. Rutas de recolección en La Araucanía. Printus, 280 pp, Temuco.
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© CSIC. Manuscripts published in both the printed and online versions of this Journal are the property of Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, and quoting this source is a requirement for any partial or full reproduction.All contents of this electronic edition, except where otherwise noted, are distributed under a “Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International” (CC BY 4.0) License. You may read here the basic information and the legal text of the license. The indication of the CC BY 4.0 License must be expressly stated in this way when necessary.
Self-archiving in repositories, personal webpages or similar, of any version other than the published by the Editor, is not allowed.
